|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王 兵,罗龙翔.“社会机器人”的再定义及社会性特征——基于系统文献法的分析[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2023,(02):106-115.
点击复制

“社会机器人”的再定义及社会性特征——基于系统文献法的分析()
分享到:

《未来传播》(浙江传媒学院学报)[ISSN:2096-8418/CN:33-1334/G2]

卷:
期数:
2023年02期
页码:
106-115
栏目:
网络文化
出版日期:
2023-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
文章编号:
2096-8418(2023)02-0106-10
作者:
王 兵1罗龙翔2
(1.清华大学新闻与传播学院,北京100084; 2.北京大学新媒体研究院,北京100871)
Author(s):
-
关键词:
社会机器人 社会性 社会线索 人机传播 智能传播
分类号:
G206
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于系统文献法,对1285篇发表于2017年至2021年间的文章进行探究,回答“社会机器人的定义和类型”与“社会机器人的社会性特征”两个关键问题。研究发现:主要可从应用场景、技术特性、功能/地位和本质等四种视角定义社会机器人; 可基于四分法、二分法、外形特征或职能/角色等标准划分社会机器人; 机器人的社会性体现在身体信号、交流行为等“外在社会性”,以及个性、情感/认知、交往中的品质等“内在社会性”两大方面。

参考文献/References:

[1] 牟怡, 许坤. 什么是人机传播?——一个新兴传播学领域之国际视域考察[J] .江淮论坛,2018(2):149-154.
[2] Breazeal,C.(2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, 59(1-2):119-155.
[3] Lutz, C.,Schöttler, M.&Hoffmann, C. P.(2019).The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping review and expert interviews. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(3):412-434.
[4] Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D.& Spence, PR.(2019). Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 90:308-314.
[5] 石婧, 艾小燕, 操子宜. 大数据是否能改进公共政策分析?——基于系统文献综述的研究[J] .情报杂志, 2018(2):161-168+121.
[6] Giansanti, D.(2021).The social robot in rehabilitation and assistance: What is the future?Healthcare, 9(3):244-253.
[7] Abendschein, B., Edwards, C. &Edwards, A.(2021).The influence of agent and message type on perceptions of social support in human-machine communication. Communication Research Reports,38(5):304-314.
[8] Carradore, M.(2021). Social robots in the home: What factors influence attitudes towards their Use in assistive care?. Italian Sociological Review, 11(3):879 - 901.
[9] Turkle,S., Taggart, W., Kidd,C. & Daste,O.(2006).Relational artifacts with children and elders. Connection Science, 18:347-361.
[10] Pirhonena,J.et al.(2021). Can robots tackle late-life loneliness? Scanning of future opportunities and challenges in assisted living facilities. Futures, 124:1-12.
[11] Chu, M. T. et al.(2016). Service innovation through social robot engagement to improve dementia care quality. Assistive Technology, 29(1):8-18.
[12] Natacha, R. et al.(2017).Affective and engagement issues in the conception and assessment of a robot-assisted psychomotor therapy for persons with dementia. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:950-964.
[13] Littler, B. et al.(2021). Reducing negative emotions in children using social robots: Systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 106(11):1-7.
[14] Chen, S.C., Cindy, J.& Wendy,M.(2018). Social robots for depression in older adults: A Systematic review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(6):612-622.
[15] Lambert, A., Norouzi, N., Bruder, G.& Welch, G.(2020). A systematic review of ten years of research on human interaction with social robots. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(19): 1804-1817.
[16] Jean-Christophe, G.et al.(2019).Humanization of robots: Is it really such a good idea?. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2):111-123.
[17] Turkle,S., Taggart,W., Kidd,C.& Daste, O.(2006).Relational artifacts with children and elders. Connection Science, 18:347-361.
[18] Wiese, E., Weis, P.P.& Lofaro, D.(2018). Embodied social robots trigger gaze following in real-time.In Frank,C. P.(eds.).15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots(UR),Honoiuiu:477-482.
[19] Barajas, N.C.,Perugia, G.& Castellano, G.(2020). The effects of robot's facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness.In Silvia,R. & Adriana,T.(eds.). 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN), Naples:165-171.
[20] Zotowski,J., Khalil,A.& Abdoesn, S.(2020). One robot doesn't fit all: Aligning social robot appearance and job suitability from a Middle Eastern perspective. AI & Society, 35(2):485-500.
[21] Furlough, C., Stokes, T.& Gillan, D. J.(2019). Attributing blame to robots:The influence of robot autonomy. The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 63(4):592-602.
[22] Konok,V.et al.(2017). Should we love robots? – The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 80:132-142.
[23] Bankins,S.& Formosa,P.(2019). When AI meets PC: Exploring the implications of workplace social robots and a human-robot psychological contract. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 29(2):215-229.
[24] Wynsberghe, A.V.(2021).Social robots and the risks to reciprocity. AI & Society, 2:1-7.
[25] Shibata, T.(2004).An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(11):1749-1758.
[26] Arnold, T.& Scheutz, M.(2017). The tactile ethics of soft robotics: Designing wisely for human-robot interaction. Soft Robotics, 4(2):2-12.
[27] 刘韩.人工智能简史[M] .北京:人民邮电出版社,2018:3.
[28] 成素梅.人工智能研究的范式转换及其发展前景[J] .哲学动态,2017(12):15-21.
[29] Winner,L.(1977). Autonomous technology:Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[30] Gates, B.(2007). A robot in every home. Scientific American, 296(1):58-65.
[31] Sabanovic,S., Michalowski,M. P.& Simmons, R.(2006). Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab.In Michael,R. & Makoto,I.(eds.).IEEE International Workshop On Advanced Motion Control.Istanbul:596-601.
[32] Kaplan, F.(2004). Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics,1(3):1-16.
[33] Schudson,M.(1989). How culture works: Perspectives from media studies on the efficacy of symbols. Theory and Society, 18(2):153-180.
[34] Turkle, S.(2007). Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies, 8(3):501-517.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:王兵,男,博士研究生; 罗龙翔,男,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-04-15