|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周睿鸣,王祎琛.“厚码”:社交媒体的可见性想象与表达策略[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2022,(06):39-46.
点击复制

“厚码”:社交媒体的可见性想象与表达策略()
分享到:

《未来传播》(浙江传媒学院学报)[ISSN:2096-8418/CN:33-1334/G2]

卷:
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
39-46
栏目:
媒介重塑
出版日期:
2022-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
文章编号:
2096-8418(2022)06-0039-08
作者:
周睿鸣1王祎琛2
(1. 浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院,浙江杭州310058; 2. 中山大学传播与设计学院,广东广州510330)
Author(s):
-
关键词:
社交媒体 可见性 厚码 社交回避
分类号:
G206.2
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
社交媒体用户如何在公共空间中能动地调节传播行为的可见性及其边界变动?束缚性公共表达如何折射我们对社交媒体可见性的想象?“厚码”这一意象可概括传播主体在社交媒体中想象其可见性并以匿名策略表达的过程。该意象历史性地展示了社交媒体成为日常媒介使用的渠道以后,作为传播主体的互联网用户对传播实践之公私边界的区隔,折射了一部分互联网用户可观的数字媒介素养和对社交媒体中介可见性的能动实践。不过,意在深度掩藏的厚码也揭开了互联网用户在数字媒介高度不确定变迁中应对预期外的传播后果时采取的实用主义的社交回避。

参考文献/References:

[1] @PITD亚洲虐待博士组织,2021年10月12日, https://m.weibo.cn/status/4691464699250315?wm=3333_2001&from=10BC393010&sourcetype=weixin, 摘自2022年1月2日.
[2]Thompson, J. B.(2005). The new visibility. Theory, Culture & Society. 22(6): 31-51.
[3]Thompson, J. B.(2011). Shifting boundaries of public and private life.Theory, Culture & Society,28(4): 49-70.
[4][英]约翰·B.汤普森. 意识形态与现代文化[M]. 高銛, 文涓, 高戈, 汐汐, 译.南京:译林出版社, 2007:268-269.
[5]孙玮, 李梦颖. “可见性”: 社会化媒体与公共领域——以占海特 “异地高考” 事件为例[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2014(2): 37-44.
[6]曾丽红,叶丹盈,李萍.社会化媒介赋权语境下女性“能动”的“可见性”——兼对B站美妆视频社区的“可供性”考察[J].新闻记者,2021(9):86-96.
[7]Cotter, K.(2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram.New Media & Society,21(4): 895-913.
[8]Duffy, B. E.& Hund, E.(2019). Gendered visibility on social media: Navigating Instagram's authenticity bind.International Journal of Communication,13: 4983-5002.
[9]Suler, J.(2004). The online disinhibition effect.Cyberpsychology & Behavior,7(3):321-326.
[10]Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C.& Siponen, M.(2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model.Information Systems Research,27(4):962-986.
[11]Ellison, N. B., Blackwell, L.Lampe, C.& Trieu, P.(2016). “The question exists, but you don't exist with it”: Strategic anonymity in the social lives of adolescents.Social Media+ Society,2(4).DOI: 10.1177/2056305116670673.
[12]Zhang, K.& Kizilcec, R. F.(2014). Anonymity in social media: Effects of content controversiality and social endorsement on sharing behavior. In Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press,643-646.
[13]De Choudhury, M.& De, S.(2014). Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity. In Eighth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press,71-80.
[14]Andalibi, N., Haimson, O. L., Choudhury, M. D.& Forte, A.(2018). Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction(TOCHI),25(5): 1-35.
[15]Marwick, A. E.& Boyd, D.(2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.New Media & Society,13(1): 114-133.
[16]Boyd,D.(2008).Why youth(heart)social network sites:The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Buckingham, D.(eds.).Youth, identity, and digital media.The John D.and Catherine T.MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press, 119-142.
[17]Dreβing, H., Bailer, J., Anders,A.,Wagner, H.& Gallas, C.(2014). Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: Prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,17(2):61-67.
[18]董晨宇, 丁依然. 当戈夫曼遇到互联网——社交媒体中的自我呈现与表演[J]. 新闻与写作, 2018(1): 56-62.
[19][法]米歇尔·福柯. 规训与惩罚[M]. 刘北成, 杨远婴, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2019:226.
[20]Litt, E.(2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,56(3):330-345.
[21]Barnes, S. B.(2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.
[22]Albrechtslund, A.(2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance.First Monday., 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142.
[23]Dienlin, T.& Metzger, M. J.(2016). An extended privacy calculus model for SNSs: Analyzing self-disclosure and self-withdrawal in a representative US sample.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,21(5): 368-383.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈国战.社交媒体与当前中国社会中的自恋主义文化[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2016,(05):30.
 Chen Guozhan.Social Media and Narcissistic Culture in Current China[J].FUTURE COMMUNICATION,2016,(06):30.
[2]刘丹.社交媒体在智慧城市建设中的传播创新[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2017,(05):52.
 Liu Dan.The Communication Innovation of Social Media in the Construction of Smart Cities[J].FUTURE COMMUNICATION,2017,(06):52.
[3]尹连根,刘运来.短视频平台的技术赋权与可见性劳动 ——基于传播政治经济学考察[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2021,(06):41.
 YIN Lian-gen & LIU Yun-lai.Technology Empowerment and Visibility Labour in Short Video Platform The Political Economy of Communication Perspective[J].FUTURE COMMUNICATION,2021,(06):41.
[4]章 宏,赵天娜.强弱关系视角下浏览健身帖对健身态度的影响研究[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2023,(04):91.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家社会科学基金青年项目“基于算法策展的新闻创新研究”(20CXW006)。 作者简介:周睿鸣,男,研究员,博士生导师; 王祎琛,女,硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-15