|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]方兴东,钟祥铭.基于TES框架透视平台社会影响与治理路径[J].未来传播(浙江传媒学院学报),2022,(03):53-64.
 FANG Xing-dong & ZHONG Xiang-ming.Perspective on the SocialImpact and Governance Path of Platform based on TES Framework[J].FUTURE COMMUNICATION,2022,(03):53-64.
点击复制

基于TES框架透视平台社会影响与治理路径()
分享到:

《未来传播》(浙江传媒学院学报)[ISSN:2096-8418/CN:33-1334/G2]

卷:
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
53-64
栏目:
网络治理
出版日期:
2022-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perspective on the SocialImpact and Governance Path of Platform based on TES Framework
文章编号:
2096-8418(2022)03-0053-12
作者:
方兴东12钟祥铭3
1.浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院,浙江杭州310012; 2.浙江大学社会治理研究院,浙江杭州 310012; 3.浙江传媒学院互联网与社会研究院,浙江杭州 310018
Author(s):
FANG Xing-dong & ZHONG Xiang-ming
关键词:
互联网平台 基础设施 平台治理 反垄断 超级平台
分类号:
D63
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
互联网平台不仅成为人们日常生活的重要构成,也开始成为社会治理、国家治理乃至国际治理的全新挑战和核心问题。社会影响以及影响背后的权力和利益是理解平台与平台治理的主线与核心逻辑。如何理性、深刻地理解互联网平台的社会影响,选择和校准最佳的平台治理路径,首先要走出技术导向的工具理性,走向价值理性和交往理论。建立全新的、前瞻的理解框架至关重要。平台作为基础设施的综合视角则提供了这个新的可能性。基于历史研究和比较研究的路径,通过对中介、平台和守门人的平台三阶段之分析,文章确立了理解和洞察当今超级平台本质的技术、经济和社会(TES)三重属性。超级平台作为数字时代关键基础设施的本质属性,使得中美欧不同体制和战略的全球三大核心区域,不约而同地形成了“数据-竞争-安全”的三大治理路径。文章以数量和规模为基本指标,划分了初级平台、一般平台和超级平台(“守门人”)三大层次,凸显了不同维度的特性且总结了互联网诞生以后,经历了科学驱动、资本驱动和制度驱动等三大力量协同与叠加的互联网平台整体发展历程和趋势。

参考文献/References:

[1] [美]乔治·莱考夫,马克·约翰逊.我们赖以生存的隐喻[M].何文忠,译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2015:1.
[2]王节祥,郭斌.从二元性到二重性[EB/OL].http://www.cssn.cn/zx/201603/t20160316_2923882.shtml.
[3]Wheelwright,S.C.& Clark,K.B.(1992).Creating project plans to focus product development.Harvard Business Review,70(2):70-82.
[4] Bogost, I. & Montfort, N.Platform studies: Frequently questioned answers. Retrieved May 24, 2022, from https://escholarship.org/content/qt01r0k9br/qt01r0k9br.pdf
[5] 徐晋.平台竞争战略[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2013:18-20.
[6]Moazed,A.& Johnson,N.L.(2016).Modern monopolies:What it takes to dominate the 21st century economy.New York:St.Martin’s Press.
[7] Parker, G., Alstyne, V. M. & Jiang,X.(2017). Platform Ecosystems:How developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly,41(1): 255-266.
[8]Kennedy,J.Monopoly myths:Do internet platforms threaten competition?Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://itif.org/publications/2020/07/23/monopoly-myths-do-internet-platforms-threaten-competition.
[9]Tiwana,A.,Konsynski,B.& Bush,A.A.(2010).Platform evolution:Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics.Information Systems Research,21(4): 675-687.
[10]Resta,G.Digital platforms and the law:Contested issues. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.medialaws.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/17.-Resta.pdf
[11]Evans,D.Economics of vertical restraints for multi-sided platforms. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1187&context=law_and_economics.
[12]Baldwin,C.Y.& Woodard,C.J.(2009).The architecture of platforms:A unified view.In Gawer, A.(eds.). Platforms, markets and innovation.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 19-44.
[13] Hatch, N. W.(2001). Review: Design rules, Volume 1: The power of modularity. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1):130–133.
[14] Gawer, A.(2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7): 1239–1249.
[15]钟祥铭,方兴东.“围墙花园”破拆:互联网平台治理的一个关键问题[J].现代出版,2021(5): 62-67.
[16]Gernot,G.& K?ig,J.(2020).Disruption,embedded.A polanyian framing of the platform economy.Sociologica,14(1): 95-118.
[17] Dijck, J. #AoIR2016: Opening keynote “The Platform Society” by José van Dijck. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ypiiSQTNqo.
[18]Davis,K.(2008).Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful.Feminist Theory,9(1):67-85.
[19]程莹.数字经济背景下互联网平台概念探析[J].法制与社会,2020(29): 123-124.

[20]刘云.互联网平台反垄断的国际趋势及中国应对[J].社会科学文摘,2021(2): 13-15.

[21] Gorwa, R.(2019). What is platform governance? Information Communication and Society, 22(6): 854-871.

[22]朱春阳,毛天婵.论互联网平台治理的现代化转型——以腾讯为例的考察[J].现代出版,2021(1): 43-47.

[23]方兴东,钟祥铭.中国门户网站之发展历程、规律和启示——反思门户思维对中国互联网和传统媒体转型的内在影响[J]. 新闻与写作,2019(2): 5-10.

[24]方兴东,严峰. 浅析超级网络平台的演进及其治理困境与相关政策建议[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017(7): 41-51.

[25]Castells,M.(2000).The rise of the network society.Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

[26]Plantin,J.C.,Lagoze,C.,Edwards,P.& Sandvig,C.(2016).Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook.New Media & Society,20(1): 293-310.

[27]Constantinides,P.,Henfridsson,O.& Parker,G.G.(2018).Introduction-platforms and infrastructures in the digital age.Information Systems Research,29(2):381-400.

[28]Helmond,A.,Nieborg,B.D.& van der Vlist,N. F.(2019).Facebook’s evolution:Development of a platform-as-infrastructure.Internet Histories,3(2): 123-146.

[29]郭小平,杨洁茹.传播在云端:平台媒体化与基础设施化的风险及其治理[J].现代出版,2021(6): 30-37.
[30]方兴东,钟祥铭.互联网平台反垄断的本质与对策[J].现代出版,2021(2): 37-45.
[31]Cammaerts,B.& Mansell,R.(2020).Digital platform policy and regulation:Toward a radical democratic turn. International Journal of Communication,14(1):135-154.
[32]Feld,H.The case for the digital platform act: Market structure and regulation of digital platforms.Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.publicknowledge.org/assets/uploads/documents/Case_for_the_Digital_Platform_Act_Harold_Feld_2019.pdf
[33]Van Dijck,J.,Nieborg,D.& Poell,T.(2019).Reframing platform power.Internet Policy Review,8(2):1-18.
[34]Wu,T.(2018).The curse of bigness:Antitrust in the new gilded age.New York:Columbia Global Reports.
[35]Khan,L.(2018).The new Brandeis movement:America’s antimonopoly debate.Journal of European Competition Law & Practice,9(3):131-132.
[36] Cusumano, M. A.Gawer, A. & Yoffie, D. B.(2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York: Harper Business.
[37] Deleuze, G.(1992). Postscript on the societies of control, In Wilson, D. & Norris, C.(eds.). Surveillance, crime and social control. London: Routledge.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:国家社科基金重大专项(21VGQ006)。
作者简介:方兴东,男,教授,博士; 钟祥铭,男,助理研究员,博士。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-15