|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]赵 莉.超越缺失模型:新媒体语境下环境传播模型的嬗变与反思[J].未来传播,2020,(03):74-80.
 Zhao Li.Beyond Deficit Model: the Evolution and Reflection of Environmental Communication Model in the Context of New Media[J].Journal of Communication University of Zhejiang,2020,(03):74-80.
点击复制

超越缺失模型:新媒体语境下环境传播模型的嬗变与反思()
分享到:

《未来传播》[ISSN:2096-8418/CN:33-1334/G2]

卷:
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
74-80
栏目:
媒介融合
出版日期:
2020-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Beyond Deficit Model: the Evolution and Reflection of Environmental Communication Model in the Context of New Media
文章编号:
2096-8418(2020)03-0074-07
作者:
赵 莉
浙江传媒学院 新闻与传播学院,浙江 杭州,310018
Author(s):
Zhao Li
关键词:
环境传播 缺失模型 情境模型 公众参与模型
分类号:
G206
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
国际环境传播主流模型的嬗变体现了不同时代背景下生态环境话语框架之间的关系以及环境传播研究与实践的变化。以专家意见和媒体知识普及为主的“缺失模型”曾经在较长时期里成为环境传播的主流模型,近年来却受到大量实证研究的挑战。为了弥补“缺失模型”的不足,新的“情境模型”强调环境传播复杂的影响因素,“公众参与模型”则鼓励公众参与建设性对话与决策。在新媒体时代的环境传播研究与实践中,需要依据我国的社会文化背景和具体的情境,深入反思及调整传播模型,扩展和深入对“情境模型”和“公众参与模型”的解读与应用,从而发展更有效的环境传播实践,以应对环境传播在全球化时代面临的重大挑战。

参考文献/References:

[1] Cox, R.(2010).Environmental communication and the public sphere(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
[2]Milstein, T.(2009). Environmental communication theories. In S. Littlejohn & K. Foss(Eds.),Encyclopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,344-349.
[3] Kempton, W.(1991).Lay Perspectives on Global Climate Change, Global Environmental Change,1(3):183-208.
[4] Brechin, S.R.(2003).Comparative Public Opinion and Knowledge on Global Climatic Change andthe Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the World? International Journal of' Sociology and Social Policy. 23(10):106-120.
[5] Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V.(2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science using practice to inform theory. In L. Kahlor & P. Stout(Eds.), Communicating science: New agendas in communication.New York, NY: Routledge,11-39.
[6] Keith R. Stamm,Fiona Clark,and Paula Reynolds Eblacas.(2000).Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems:the case of global warming. Public Understanding of Science,9(3):219- 237.
[7] Plotnikoff. R.C., Wright.M. and Karunamuni, N.(2004).Knowledge. Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Climate Change in Alberta, Canada: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice, Environmental health Research, 14(3):223-29.
[8] Pitrelli, N., Manzoli, F., & Montolli, B.(2006). Science in advertising: Uses and consumptionsin the Italian press. Public Understanding of Science, 15(2):207-220.
[9] Brossard, D. & Lewnstein, B. V.(2011). A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science. In: L. Kahlor & P. A. Stout.(Eds). Communicating Science new Agendas in Communication.New York:the Routledge Press.
[10] Matthew C. Nisbet(2009). Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,51(2):34-47.
[11] Macnaghten. P. and Jacobs, M.(1997).Public Identification with Sustainable Development: Investigating Cultural Barriers to Participation.Globle Environmental Change,7(1):5-24.
[12]Löfstedt.(2005).Risk management in post-trust societies.Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants.
[13]Lorenzoni I and Hulme M.(2009).Believing is seeing: Laypeople's views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and Italy.Public Understanding of Science,18(4):383–400.
[14] Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R.(2004).See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
[15] Kahan, D. Making climate science communication evidence based all the way down.Retrieved 2013,from http://www.culturalcognition.net/browse-papers/making-climate-sciencecommunication-evidence-basedall-the-w.html.
[16] Cox, R.(2006).Environmental communication and the public sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[17] Habermas, J.(1998). On the pragmatics of communication.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[18] Jacobs, L., Cook, F., & Carpini, M.(2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and politicalparticipation in America.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[19] Parks, JM&Theobald, KS.(2013).Public engagement with information on renewable energy developments: The case of single, semi-urban wind turbines.Public Understanding of Science, 22(1):49-64.
[20] Sarah Schweizer, Shawn Davis & Jessica Leigh Thompson.(2013).Changing the Conversation about Climate Change: A Theoretical Framework for Place-Based Climate Change Engagement,Environmental Communication, 7(1):42-62.
[21] McComas, K., & Shanahan, J.(1999). Telling stories about global climate change: Measuring the impact of narratives on issues cycles. Communication Research, 26(1):30-57.
[22]唐佳梅. 中西比较视域下的环境新闻传播研究——基于对CNKI和EBSCO-CMCC文献的分析[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2012(10).
[23]龙小农,舒凌云.自媒体时代舆论聚变的非理性与信息公开滞后性的互构——以“PX项目魔咒”的建构为例[J].浙江学刊,2013(3).
[24]石如.环境群体性事件的传播模式及其媒体动员研究[D].华中科技大学,2013.
[25]金恒江,余来辉,张国良.媒介使用对个体环保行为的影响——基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS 2013)数据的实证研究[J].新闻大学,2017(2).
[26]杜骏飞.对话2013年新媒体传播研究[J].编辑之友,2014(2).
[27]郭小平.“邻避冲突”中的新媒体、公民记者与环境公民社会的“善治”[J].国际新闻界,2013(5).
[28]贾广惠.论环保传播对公民社会的初步建构[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2009(6).
[29]黄煌,曾繁旭.从以邻为壑到政策倡导:中国媒体与社会抗争的互激模式[J].新闻学研究(台北),2013(109).
[30]戴佳,曾繁旭,黄硕.环境传播的伦理困境[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2015(5).
[31] Lakoff, G.(1996).Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[32] Brulle, R.J., & Jenkins, J.C.(2008). Fixing the bungled U.S. environmental movement. Contexts,7(2):14-18.
[33] 赵莉.论环保公共舆论空间的构建[J].中国广播电视学刊,2018(8).
[34] 陈虹,潘玉.从话语到行动:环境传播多元主体协同治理新模式[J].新闻记者,2018(2).
[35]刘翠霞.公众理解科学:模型变革与范式改进[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017(6).
[36]吴帆.社会治理现代化与社会治理共同体建设[J].社会治理,2019(11).
[37]贾鹤鹏,范敬群,彭光芒.从公众参与科学视角看微博对科学传播的挑战[J].科普研究,2014(4).
[38]杨建华.社会复合主体的探索推进了公共精神的发育生成[J].杭州(我们),2011(2).

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:本文系2019年浙江省哲学社会科学规划之江青年课题“人类命运共同体视阈下的国家环保形象传播研究”(19ZJQN18YB)的研究成果之一。
作者简介:赵莉,女,副教授,博士,英国剑桥大学访问学者。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-15